The text states that a work less than 70 words is not evaluated. It also mentions that a work fully rewritten or retold from the original text, with commentaries, is evaluated with zero points. The text then asks to discuss the theme 'What kind of person can be called courageous?', suggesting to use supporting evidence from the read text and that different methods of referencing are acceptable. Following this, it's stated that a work of argumentation must be at least 70 words, and a work fully rewritten or retold from the original text, with commentaries, is evaluated with zero points. Finally, it asks to write the answer next to the corresponding number.

Analysis of the requirements for written works:

Based on the provided text, the evaluation criteria for written works are as follows:

• Word Count: A minimum of 70 words is required for a work to be evaluated. Works below this limit are not assessed.
• Originality and Content:
  • Works that are fully rewritten or retold from the original text, including commentaries, will receive zero points. This implies that the focus is on original thought and analysis, not mere reproduction.
  • When discussing the theme 'What kind of person can be called courageous?', it is important to provide evidence from the text. Various methods of referencing this evidence are permitted.
• Argumentation: Works intended as argumentation must meet the 70-word minimum.
• Presentation: The text mentions 'legible handwriting' in the context of a work being evaluated with zero points, suggesting that poor handwriting might also negatively impact the evaluation, though it's directly linked to the 'rewritten/retold' condition in that sentence.

The instruction to 'write the answer next to the corresponding number' suggests that the user should follow a specific format when submitting their work, likely related to a numbering system in an exam or assignment.

Summary of conditions for zero points:

• Less than 70 words.
• Fully rewritten or retold from the original text (with commentaries).

Note: The prompt is in Russian, and the analysis is based on the provided OCR text.