The first table shows values for x and y. From the visible data, we can infer points like (-2, ?) and (1, 1) or (5, ?). If we assume the equation is y = -2x + 3, then for x = -2, y = -2(-2) + 3 = 4 + 3 = 7. For x = 1, y = -2(1) + 3 = -2 + 3 = 1. For x = 5, y = -2(5) + 3 = -10 + 3 = -7. The table shows y values of 1 and 2 for x values of -2 and 5, which does not directly match y = -2x + 3 unless there's a typo in the table or the equation written above it is incorrect. However, if we assume the x values are -2 and 1, the corresponding y values should be 7 and 1. If we assume the y values are 1 and 2, then for y=1, 1 = -2x + 3, so -2x = -2, x = 1. For y=2, 2 = -2x + 3, so -2x = -1, x = 0.5. It's possible the equation and the table are not perfectly aligned or there are intended points to be plotted. Given the visual, it is most likely that the equation y = -2x + 3 is intended, and the table might contain errors or represent different points.
The second table shows values for x and y. We see points like (2, 0) and (-1, ?). The equation provided is y = 2x - 4. Let's check the points:
The second table correctly represents points for the equation y = 2x - 4.